HGU-15/P, HGU-20/P, AOH-1 and other clamshell helmets
Message 2967, Jun 17, 2001
Hi Bones, Well, the clam-shell was not really pressure-gear in the conventional sense. It
was not used as part of a partial or full pressure suit assembly, but rather as an
integrated oxygen breathing and crash protective helmet (as Figmo already referenced, the
original Navy concept was termed the Aviator Oxygen Helmet model 1, or AOH-1). It simply
integrated the 02 breathing system into the area around the front of the face, rather than
into an oronasal mask, as in a conventional system. Only the facial area, which was sealed
off from the rest of the helmet by an air-damming seal, was exposed to the incoming
oxygen. The aft 2/3rds of the helmet was open to ambient (cockpit) air (and pressure).
The story of the clamshell and its entire, fascinating story of development, makes for one
very interesting reading. The ideas behind it were sound, even if the technology wasn't
yet quite capable of meeting the design objectives; it died a premature death for a number
of practical physiological and human-factor reasons, having much to do with concerns
involving pilot comfort, High-G spinal loading, peripheral visual fields restriction,
conflict with other items of flightgear (snagging on chute harness Capewells and Koch
fittings) and just plain old pilot bias for unrestrictive, lighter weight headgear.
The clamshell was originally flight tested by the Air Force in F-105s and F-104s, and
later in the Navy by A-7, A-4, F-8, and F-4 drivers. The reports written about the
operational flight testing experiences by the Air Force pilots participating in these
tests make very engaging reading, also. It is significant that the casual observer could
readily mistake the clam-shell for a pressure helmet, given the similarities in both
design and appearance. If you want to see a couple of REALLY interesting photos, ask Figmo
about what he believes are the "clamshell precursor" helmets the Navy tested (an
example of one of which was apparently auctioned off on eBay about a year ago).
Cheers, DocBoink
Message 2965, Jun 17, 2001
Greetings Neat Photo!! Why would a guy be wearing pressure gear in an A-7? I thought that
A-7s were for low level. That nose reminds me, I had a pilot grouping from a Crusader
pilot, APH-5 helmet, with a MS22001 set up for liquid oxygen, the guy's name was Rice. I
also had his flight suit (brown, not orange or khaki), and g-suit.
Bones
Message 2963, Jun 16, 2001
Thought you all might get a kick out of the enclosed photo from "Air War Over South
East Asia" a Pictorial Record Volume 2 1967-1970 by Lou Drendel. This is an A-7 on
the Coral Sea. photo dated Dec 20, 1969.
Cheers, FIGMO
Message 2962, Jun 16, 2001
Hi John, Definitely post some photos of your clamshell. If you show me yours, I'll show
you mine, heh-heh. The clamshell is a special interest helmet for several of us (including
meself and Figmo). Love to see yours and $500 is a give-away, considering what these
rarities bring now. Consider yourself LUCKY! There is an old expression of American slang
that you may recall: "Happy as a clam in a high tide at Puget Sound". Well,
anyone should know that real happiness is "Another clamshell safe in a museum".
Cheers, DocBoink
Message 2961, Jun 16, 2001
Hi Steve, Thank's for the info on the HGU-20/P, Do you have any info on how many 20/P's
the Navy bought? I heard 750 when I picked up mine ( paid 550.00 for it about 10 years ago
when I first started collecting gear, had no idea what it was but knew it was rare) Mine
was issued to a USMC Capt. F4 backseater (It's the helmet in JAFC with the Phantom guy
sitting on a Sidewinder) If anyone is interested, I could post some Jpegs, let me know.
John
Message 2957, Jun 16, 2001
Thanks Figmo, My world picture is back in sync. This helmet ought to get its owner a
pretty penny.
Cheers, Bluelight
Message 2955, Jun 16, 2001
Nicely summarised, Figmo! It should also be pointed out that the information that Trey
Turner has on the clamshell (HGU-20/P) on his site (in the "X-files" section
detailing helmets of particular interest) is essentially incorrect and misleading. I was
so concerned by his inaccurate spin on the clam-shell, a few years ago, that I went to the
trouble of preparing a small paper on it for him to use and possibly to include directly
in his X-Files description. Although Trey acknowledged receipt of it, he apparently never
undertook modifying his original remarks and one unhappy result is that with his large
audience of site visitors, a great many people end up reading his remarks and laboring
under misapprehensions about this helmet's actual history. Although Trey has helped our
area of interest greatly by spreading the word about flightgear throughout the world, this
particular entry has had the reverse effect in terms of separating fact from fiction: the
spread and furtherance of bad and just plain inaccurate information does no one a favor.
Keep this in mind if any of you ever visit his site and look up the helmet in his
"X-files" menu.
Cheers, Doc(History-Police)Boink
Message 2953, Jun 16, 2001
HGU-15/P vs HGU-20/P Clamshell. The JAFH stated that the HGU-15/P was a modified version
of the HGU-20/P. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE for an earlier type designation to be based on a later
designation. Simply stated: type designations are assigned, and never re-used. It defeats
the purpose of the designation system. The history of the clamshell is fairly straight
forward AND WELL DOCUMENTED. The US Navy had a program called the Aviator's Oxygen Helmet
aka AOH-1. Based on the Robertshaw Mini oxygen regulator and a helmet designed by
Protection Inc. The program was lagging and Robertshaw tried to get the USAF interested.
First, the helmet had to be officially assigned a number.
HGU-15/P was assigned 10 Jan 1963. During 1963-64 a field test at George AFB was conducted
using F-104 and F-105 pilots (Report 909-026-025 issued 5 Jan 1964). At least 2 of the
actual HGU-15/Ps still exist. The results were not favorable and the type designation was
cancelled 1/16/64. There are literally several hundred pages of information on this
helmet: type designation sheet, reports, Field manuals for maintenance and fitting of the
helmets.
The HGU-20/P type designation was assigned 1-30-68 to Helmet, Aviator's, Intergrated
Oxygen. Requested by Naval Air Engineering Center. Fully five years after the HGU-15/P.
The HGU-20/P was not well received and didn't last long although there are photos showing
the helmet being worn into combat by A-7 pilots. Again, NAVAIR documents running into
several hundred pages exist for this helmet.
In 1971, a study was undertaken to test the clamshell design for CB use. The helmet on
E-Bay is one of the 16 study examples from this experiment. The report of this study
clearly states that the helmet is NOT the HGU-15/P but CB helmet modified FROM the
HGU-15/P. An honest mistake was made and then reported in the JAFH book.
For the record: Gentex purchased Protection Inc. in the mid 1960s. It appears that Gentex
Western Operations and Flight Suits Ltd are the two organizations that emerged from this
merger. The clamshell design was used by NASA for early shuttle missions. Contrary to
earlier information, the NASA version is identical to the earlier clam shells except for
the addition of a second microphone. Clint Eastwood wore a modified clam shell for the
Foxfire 3 movies provided from Gentex Western Operations. The clamshell design has been
used in non aviation applications most notably for chemical cleaning suits.
Cheers all, FIGMO
PS: Much of this information was provided in a telephone interview with a gentelmen at
Gentex Western operations who in all actuality, designed the clam shell helmet for
Protection Inc.
Message 2948, Jun 16, 2001
Heads up pressure helmet buffs, There is an HGU-15/P pressure helmet avaliable on eBay.
Why would a helmet modified from an HGU-20/P be designated HGU-15/P? It defies my logic
that it gets a lower number.
Cheers, Bluelight
Message 1736:
Figmo, Roger on the clam-shell sunglasses complaint. A lot of the Air Force clam-shell
objections were rather weakly based, but such complaints as compound cervical spine
loading in hi-G situations, restricted bilateral peripheral vision, and the chin section
snagging on chute harness Capewells (while checking 6) were quite legitimate. It is ironic
that by the time many of these concerns were able to be resolved through the use of
lighter, more 'state of the art' materials (such as were used in the NASA LEH version that
came along in the early 80s), the clam-shell was essentially already but an interesting
footnote in life support R&D history. I suppose this is sad from a developmental
standpoint, but it happily adds further fascinating historical 'meat' to the clam-shell
saga...in turn contributing to enhancing their value and rarity as a 'great idea that
failed'.
Cheers, DocBoink
Message 1735:
If you read between the lines in the USAF helmet development effort a couple of things
seem to repeat: Visibility to a fighter Jock is everything, increased helmet Weight means
less Gs, and how do you eject into a 600 MPH wind with losing you helmet? The clamshell
could withstand the windblast but weighed 7 pounds and had really poor visibility. It
would appear that if you had to pick what was most important, the fighter jocks wanted
lightweight and good visibility which the MB-3 would offer. Keeping it on after egress
seems to be another story. If you read the USAF test on the HGU-15/P, I think the F-104
jocks (Did I get the right group Chris) didn't like the helmet because they couldn't wear
their sunglasses with it.
Cheers, FIGMO
Message 825:
Please see attached photos. I am sure this is the same helmet and I am still trying to
trace it to the AOH-1 program. Sorry for the quality of the photos. They are the best
available.Cheers, Steve N
Message 824:
Hi Ron: This helmet shown in use in the F-8U pic is not the conventional USN clam-shell
you are thinking of, but a rather rare and unusual experimental helmet, an example of
which actually showed up on eBay about 6 months ago! I was going to attach photos of it,
but I seem to be unable to relocate where I stashed my images of this interesting assembly
as it appeared on eBay (this was in June of this last year--6/2000); Steve Norris probably
has the images referred to, as he and I had quite a lengthy exchange on this subject, when
we first spotted the helmet on eBay, last June, trying to figure out what it was (we also
at first thought it was an AOH-1 or clam-shell prototype). Someone named Joe Levantis
ended up buying it for about $1500 or so, I seem to recall. The helmet was most
interesting and I distinctly recall my amazement at finding this same photo you have
attached an image of (thanks to Steve), after the helmet itself went on the block through
eBay. [Steve N., do you still have the images I refer to; seem to have misplaced my own.]
Cheers, Chris
Message 816:
Hi All, And yet another mystery helmet (to me that is). Came across this picture in an old
book. It shows and LTV F-8 and more important the pilot wearing an unusual helmet. Is this
a clamshell example? Hope it is of interest. Bye Ron
F-8 Crusader pilot wearing what is most likely an AOH-1
helmet
(see message 824 and 825 above) © US Navy